Outcomes following endorectal pull-through for Hirschsprung disease: a retrospective study

Abstract

Purpose

To share our experience in the surgical management of patients with Hirschsprung disease (HD) using the trans-anal endorectal pull-through “Soave” technique.

Methods

The study included cases diagnosed as HD who were operated during the period 2008 through 2018. Cases of total colonic aganglionosis were excluded to be discussed in a separate report.

Results

The study included 67 consecutive cases of HD. All included cases underwent trans-anal endorectal pull-through which was purely trans-anal in 31 (46%), while abdominal-assisted trans-anal endorectal pull-through was applied in the remaining (54%). Early postoperative complications included 2 cases of partial dehiscence at the colo-anal anastomosis; 1 of them deteriorated after re-exploration and unfortunately died. Twenty-six cases were available to assess functional outcomes after corrective surgery. Their age at follow-up ranged between 44 months and 17 years (mean = 78.8 months; median = 72 months). All cases achieved voluntary defecation. However, fecal soiling was a common finding after surgery for HD (69%). Constipation was another common postoperative finding (73%). Lastly, a history of attacks of postoperative enterocolitis was prevalent in 19 cases (73%), which ranged between 1 and 7 attacks usually in the first 2 years after the operation.

Conclusion

The trans-anal endorectal pull-through provides an effective surgical treatment for Hirschsprung disease. The high prevalence of fecal soiling after surgery highlights the importance of long-term follow-up to provide the required support for these patients during adolescence and transition into adulthood.

Background

Hirschsprung disease (HD) is a rare congenital disease with a reported incidence of about 1:5000 live births [1]. During fetal life, failure of migration of neural crest-derived cells along the gut results in distal intestinal aganglionosis essentially affecting the rectum and variable length of the distal colon. HD is classified according to the length of the aganglionic bowel segment into short-segment HD (recto-sigmoid, 75%), long-segment HD (extending proximal to the sigmoid colon, 15%), and other rare forms that may exist as total colonic or total intestinal aganglionosis (10%) [2, 3]. Dysfunction of the affected bowel segment involves motility, secretion, and barrier functions, which are under the control of the enteric nervous system [2]. Typically, the disease is manifested by constipation, abdominal distension, and intestinal obstruction. HD is considered a debilitating disease which can be fatal if untreated. However, advances in diagnosis and surgical treatment dramatically reduced morbidity and mortality [3].

The disease is named after Harald Hirschsprung who early reported on a case of constipation due to dilatation and hypertrophy of the colon in 1886 [4]. In 1948, Orvar Swenson described the narrowing of the distal colon (absent peristalsis) and suggested that removal of this colonic segment would provide a surgical cure for HD [5]; the disease then became of great interest to pediatric surgeons all over the world. Franco Soave (1964) introduced the idea of endorectal pull-through by dissecting the surgical plane between the mucosa and the muscle of the rectum in order to protect the nearby pelvic nerves and genitourinary structures [5]. Later in 1998, Luis de la Torre modified Soave’s procedure by performing a single-stage trans-anal endorectal pull-through [6].

In this retrospective study, we would like to share our experience in the surgical management of patients with HD applying the trans-anal endorectal pull-through (Soave’s procedure) whether as a purely trans-anal or abdominally assisted approach.

Methods

The study included cases diagnosed as HD who were operated during the period 2008 through 2018. Cases of total colonic aganglionosis were excluded to be discussed in a separate report. Data retained by the author were retrospectively analyzed and included demographic data (sex, age at operation), investigations, operative details, and short-term outcomes. The study was conducted after internal review board approval.

The typical presentation included delayed passage of meconium, constipation, and abdominal distension, while some cases presented with neonatal intestinal obstruction and bilious vomiting. The diagnosis was usually confirmed by the typical findings in contrast enema studies, which has the additional benefit of determining the extent of aganglionic (spastic) bowel segment (Fig. 1). However, there is almost a consensus on the necessity of obtaining pre-operative histopathological evidence of HD, which requires a rectal biopsy. The latter may be performed as a bedside suction biopsy; however, only full-thickness rectal biopsy was available at our facility. Few cases, who were not doing well (e.g., bowel perforation), underwent exploration and leveling colostomy as an initial step before corrective surgery.

Fig. 1

Contrast enema of three different cases of “recto-sigmoid” Hirschsprung disease (a–c). Note the different lengths of the aganglionic (spastic) segment which is longest in c and shortest in a

Trans-anal endorectal pull-through (Soave’s procedure) [6]

Position

The procedure was performed either in the prone or supine lithotomy position (Fig. 2) [7]. The former position may be preferred for a pure trans-anal procedure. However, for patients with colostomy or when expected to need additional laparotomy for mobilization of the colon from above, the supine position was definitely advantageous.

Fig. 2

Trans-anal endorectal pull-through (Soave’s procedure). The procedure can be performed either in the prone (a) or supine lithotomy position (b)

Anal retraction

Early during the study period, we used simple stitches to retract/open the anus allowing for trans-anal (endo-rectal) dissection (Fig. 2). Later, we shifted to using the Lone-Star retractor (when it became available, Fig. 3), which provided better exposure for trans-anal dissection compared to simple stitches. The latter was noticed to evert the anus rather than providing optimal retraction.

Fig. 3

Trans-anal endorectal pull-through (Soave’s procedure). a Note advancing the hooks of the Lone-Star retractor hiding the dentate line to protect the anal canal during the early beginning of dissection. b After submucosal injection of adrenaline/saline solution (1/200,000)

Trans-anal excision of aganglionic rectum

We start by submucosal injection of adrenaline/saline solution (1/200,000) in different quadrants above the dentate line (Fig. 3). This has the dual benefit of inducing hydro-dissection and minimizing bleeding. A circular mucosal incision is made 2 cm above the dentate line via a needle monopolar diathermy. Multiple stay sutures help to distribute the tension on the anal mucosa during traction. The first few centimeters of the rectum (3–7 cm) are excised via submucosal dissection before we shift to full-thickness excision (Fig. 4). The retained muscular cuff of the rectum is incised posteriorly; sometimes, we excise a strip of this muscle cuff. We continue to excise the abnormal/spastic bowel till we reach a healthy segment of the colon 7–10 cm above the characteristic “funnel” of the transitional zone. The latter was usually obvious at operation and well-consistent with the pre-operative imaging findings (Fig. 5) [8]. Intra-operative histopathological analysis (frozen section) to determine the level of the healthy proximal colonic segment for the pull-through was not our routine practice; however, this was occasionally essential and helpful when there was no consensus on the level of the transitional zone in the pre-operative imaging.

Fig. 4

Excised specimens in three different cases of Hirschsprung disease who underwent trans-anal endorectal pull-through (a–c). The first few centimeters of the rectum (3–7 cm) are excised via submucosal dissection before we shift to full-thickness excision. Note the variable length of submucosal dissection of the rectum (double arrowhead dotted line). Recently, there is a tendency to do less submucosal dissection in order to leave a shorter muscle cuff. d, e The contrast enema of cases a and c, respectively, are presented for comparing the operative findings with preoperative imaging. Note: contrast enema of case b was not available

Fig. 5

Trans-anal endorectal pull-through (Soave’s procedure) in two different cases of Hirschsprung disease. a, c The preoperative contrast enema showing the level of the transitional zone in the two cases. b, d The operative findings in the two cases, which proved to be well consistent with the preoperative imaging findings

Before turning to the final step of the procedure (colo-anal anastomosis), we had to straighten the retained rectal muscular cuff (make sure it is not rolled upon itself) to avoid postoperative obstruction. Also, it may be useful to add a layer of interrupted seromuscular stitches fixing the pulled-through colon/neorectum to the retained muscle cuff at a deeper level to the final colo-anal anastomosis.

Cases with colostomy or abdominal-assisted trans-anal pull-through

In the supine lithotomy position, we start by taking down the colostomy and/or mobilization of the colon making sure to preserve the marginal vessels to ensure reliable blood supply to the pulled-through colon. In addition to cases with colostomy, assistance via laparotomy was indicated for cases with long aganglionic segment and/or severely distended colon (Fig. 1c). The laparotomy incision was usually a left lower transverse (muscle splitting) incision. Alternatively, a lower midline incision may be used which has the advantage of easy extension to the upper abdomen as needed (e.g., mobilization of splenic flexure). In all cases, the laparotomy incision was used to ensure adequate mobilization of the colon, while the trans-anal part of the procedure was completed as previously described.

Early postoperative care

Usually, enteral feeding is resumed gradually on the 2nd or 3rd postoperative day. With the progression of feeding, abdominal distension is not uncommon; this is managed by temporarily withholding oral intake and maybe gentle insertion of a soft rectal tube. Most patients will have reached full oral intake to be discharged on the 7th to 10th postoperative day. Rectal examination should be performed routinely at follow-up visits (starting 2–3 weeks postoperatively) to check for possible narrowing at the colo-anal anastomosis.

Intermediate and long-term follow-up

Parents of operated cases were contacted via their registered phone numbers. They were informed about the study and were encouraged to visit the outpatient clinic to assess functional outcomes following corrective surgery.

Results

The study included 67 consecutive cases of HD (excluding total colonic aganglionosis) that were operated during the period 2008 through 2018. Their age at the time of corrective surgery ranged between 1 and 72 months (mean = 11.8 months, median = 6 months). As already known [1], there was obvious male predominance (56 cases were males, 83%). In this series, only 2 cases were diagnosed as long-segment HD with an aganglionic segment extending proximal to the sigmoid colon (up to the splenic flexure and transverse colon), while the rest of the cases were rectosigmoid HD (97%) (Fig. 1). Nine cases (13.4%) underwent colostomy as an initial procedure before the corrective surgery. All included cases underwent trans-anal endorectal pull-through (Soave procedure) [6, 7] which was purely trans-anal in 31 (46%), while in the remaining (including 9 cases with colostomy), assistance through a laparotomy incision was required (abdominal assisted trans-anal Soave, 54%).

The early postoperative period went smoothly in all but two cases. The first case was a girl who had a leveling pelvic colostomy initially performed before the definitive surgery. Later at the age of 6 years, she underwent abdominal-assisted trans-anal endorectal pull-through, when she presented on the 11th postoperative day (3 days after discharge from the hospital) with a picture of pelvic infection: fever and abdominal distension with mild tenderness, while ultrasound examination showed mild pelvic collection. A decision was taken to explore the abdomen for fear of leakage at the anastomotic site. At exploration, the abdomen was clean with few flakes of pus in the pelvis. Under general anesthesia, the colo-anal anastomosis was inspected through the anus showing partial posterior dehiscence which was left uninterrupted. A diverting proximal transverse colostomy was performed with smooth postoperative recovery. Two months later, rectal examination and distal colon contrast studies confirmed complete/good healing at the colo-anal anastomosis when a decision was made to close the colostomy. Postoperative recovery went uneventful, and the patient showed good functional outcomes at follow-up (she had voluntary defecation without fecal soiling).

The second case was a 1-year-old boy (Down syndrome) diagnosed with rectosigmoid HD who underwent primary abdominal-assisted trans-anal Soave. The patient developed insidious abdominal distension; a decision was made on the fifth postoperative day to withhold oral intake which did not improve the condition. A rectal tube was inserted but failed to relieve the distension. Masked by the laxity of his abdomen (Down syndrome), the condition passed unnoticed for 2 days before we discovered that the rectal tube has perforated into the peritoneal cavity through partial dehiscence at the colo-anal anastomosis. A decision was made for fecal diversion. At exploration, there were scattered flakes of pus between the intestines. Peritoneal lavage and diverting transverse colostomy were performed; however, the patient’s general condition rapidly deteriorated and died 2 days later.

Functional outcome

Among the cases who were successfully contacted by phone, 26 cases responded and were available to assess the functional outcome after corrective surgery. Their age at follow-up ranged between 44 months and 17 years (mean = 78.8 months; median = 72 months).

Fecal continence was evaluated according to the Krickenbeck postoperative assessment protocol (Table 1) [9]. Obstructive symptoms were evaluated by asking about attacks of postoperative enterocolitis (abdominal distension, loose offensive stools, vomiting). The severity of the latter was judged by the necessity of hospital admission. Table 2 summarizes the data of the 26 patients who were available at follow-up. Although all cases achieved voluntary defecation as older children, yet fecal soiling was a common finding after surgery for HD (69%). We could differentiate between 2 types of fecal soiling. The first was during the daytime when the child was awake, and this was graded according to the Krickenbeck system. Most cases with daytime soiling (14/16; 87.5%) had mild (grade 1, occasional) soiling. The second type of fecal soiling was nocturnal when the child was asleep, which was reported in 8 cases. Constipation was another common postoperative finding (73%). Lastly, a history of attacks of postoperative enterocolitis was prevalent in 19 cases (73%), which ranged between 1 and 7 attacks usually in the first 2 years after the operation (Table 2).

Table 1 Krickenbeck international classification for postoperative results

Table 2 Data of the 26 patients who were available to assess functional outcomes after corrective surgery for Hirschsprung disease

Discussion

Hirschsprung disease is one important cause of lower intestinal obstruction and constipation in the pediatric age group. Usually, the disease can be cured by surgery with reported fair outcomes especially among those with typical rectosigmoid disease [10]. Successive efforts of scientists and researchers in the field have caused major advances in the diagnosis and surgical treatment. Transplantation of enteric neuronal stem cells into the aganglionic gut is still under investigation in animal models, which may open a new era for the potential cure of HD without invasive surgery [2].

The trans-anal approach for resection of the distal aganglionic bowel segment represented a breakthrough in the surgical management of HD [6, 7]. While applying Soave’s principle of submucosal (endorectal) resection of the rectum, the trans-anal approach rapidly gained widespread acceptance to become the most popular choice whether as pure trans-anal or abdominal assisted. The latter has been advocated to avoid the limitations associating the pure trans-anal approach, which in certain situations can hinder the effective mobilization of the colon and affect the judgment on the level of the dilated segment and transitional zone before the start of dissection. More recently, some authors encourage adding laparoscopy routinely to the trans-anal approach in all cases of HD [11]. Moreover, some authors shifted to Swenson’s principle (full-thickness resection of the rectum from the start) through the same trans-anal approach to avoid potential complications of the retained rectal muscle cuff [7, 12].

The transformation to minimally invasive techniques (trans-anal resection/laparoscopy) has contributed to improving outcomes and decreasing surgical morbidity. More attention has been directed to the preservation of continence and improving quality of life. As the rectum is essentially excised in the corrective surgery for HD, preservation of the anal canal becomes of utmost importance. Regardless of the age at operation, some experts recommend preserving at least 1.5–2 cm of the anal canal above the dentate line. Others highlight the benefit of advancing the hooks of the Lone-Star retractor to protect the anal canal during the early beginning of dissection [13]. While these recommendations appear to improve the potential for fecal continence, we may expect more patients to present with postoperative obstructive symptoms and enterocolitis [14]. Postoperative Botox injection of the anal sphincters has been used more liberally in recent literature with promising results in controlling such postoperative obstructive symptoms [15].

In this case series, the trans-anal endorectal pull-through was an effective technique to treat patients with HD, which was associated with a low incidence of complications and a fair functional outcome. The postoperative complications were restricted to partial dehiscence at the colo-anal anastomosis in two cases (3%). Despite the uncommon occurrence of complications, still a high index of suspicion and prompt active surgical management remain the only way to avoid rapid deterioration and losing the child. Patients with HD appear to be more vulnerable pediatric surgical patients that can deteriorate rapidly due to associated defective intestinal functions; the condition may be even worse with the association of Down syndrome and HD, which has been reported to be associated with higher morbidity and mortality [16].

Fecal soiling is a common functional problem after operations for HD [10, 13, 17, 18]. Variable rates have been reported in the literature ranging between 1.5 and 55% [18, 19]. In their review article, Ahmed et al. reported approximately 40% rate of fecal incontinence among children after HD pull-through [17]. In our study, all cases who were available at follow-up achieved voluntary defecation as older children; however, postoperative fecal soiling was still very common (69%). Although this percentage appears higher than what has been reported in the literature, fecal soiling was mostly mild (occasional) and did not cause major social problems; almost all cases were regularly attending their schools without restrictions. There are several causes for fecal soiling after pull-through operations for HD that are broadly categorized by experts as abnormalities in sensation, abnormalities in sphincter control, and pseudo-incontinence (due to fecal impaction or hypermotility) [20]. Nocturnal fecal soiling appears to be a peculiar symptom with HD that needs deeper analysis searching for practical solutions. In their report, Saadai et al. [20] suggested an algorithm for the diagnosis and management of a child with soiling after a pull-through for HD. The high prevalence of fecal soiling after operations for HD highlights the importance of long-term follow-up to provide the required support for these patients during adolescence and transition into adulthood [10]. Another important issue after operations for HD is the obstructive symptoms and Hirschsprung-associated enterocolitis [21]. It is important to educate parents about this serious problem. Prompt deflation of the colon (soft rectal tubes), antibiotic treatment, the alarming signs, and when there is a need for hospital admission are important issues to be discussed with the parents before discharge from the hospital.

The study is limited by its retrospective nature lacking planned follow-up details and being restricted to a single center. Although digital storing of data was helpful in collecting a relatively good number of consecutive cases that were operated by the same technique over a long period of time, some diagnostic investigations were missing at the time of writing this report. Some of the cases were contacted by phone and were available to assess functional outcomes several years after the corrective surgery; however, these represented only 38% of operated cases. Lastly, more focus should be directed to long-term follow-up that can help to provide counseling regarding the high prevalence of fecal soiling.

Conclusion

The trans-anal endorectal pull-through provides an effective surgical treatment for Hirschsprung disease. Despite the uncommon occurrence of postoperative complications, a high index of suspicion and prompt surgical management is crucial to deal successfully with such complications when it occurs. The high prevalence of fecal soiling after surgery highlights the importance of long-term follow-up to provide the required support for these patients during adolescence and transition into adulthood.