Skip to main content

Burn trauma in infants

Abstract

Background

A wealth of data exists concerning pediatric burn epidemiology in general, but more is explicitly needed in infants under 1 year of age, a particular group in which mobility begins to develop.

Methods

In this study,206 patients followed up for burns in Diyarbakır Gazi Yaşargil Training and Research Hospital Burn Center between January 2016 and September 2021 were included in the study.

Results

Of the patients, 120 (58.3%) were male, and 86 (41.7%) were female. The mean age was 10.0 ± 2.0 months. The total number of cases ranged from 3 to 12 months, with the incidence of burns peaking at 12 months.

When we look at the etiology of burns, scalding burns were the most common, with 184 (89.3%) cases. Most of the burns occurred in the kitchen because their mothers and children spent a lot of time there.

It was positive in 23.8% of the wound culture results obtained with a punch biopsy. Staphylococcus aureus was the most abundant microorganism in wound culture results, with 5.8%. The mean hospital stay of the patients was 4.99 ± 3.67 days. Our mortality rate was 1.94% (n:4).

Conclusion

In conclusion, As preventive measures, it is necessary to increase protective measures at home and to raise awareness of families about burn etiologies.

Background

Burns are a common cause of mortality and morbidity in children, especially in developing countries [1]. Children aged three years and younger are among the most risk groups for mortality in burn trauma, and they are more exposed to death from burns than any other age group [2]. There is limited data on burns in children younger than one year that require hospitalization worldwide [3]. Due to the relative limitation of movement in this age group, the causes of controllable burns are expected to be preventable in these children. However, despite the preventable causes of burns, burn injuries continue and cause mortality and long-term morbidity.

Although the treatment of pediatric burn patients is similar to that of adults, there are essential differences in the physiology, acute pain management, and psychology of the pediatric patient [4, 5]. Children have nearly three times adults' body surface area (BSA) to body mass ratio. Fluid losses are proportionately higher in children than in adults. Consequently, children have more significant fluid resuscitation requirements and evaporative water loss than adults. The large BSA-to-body mass ratio of the child also predisposes the child to hypothermia, which must be aggressively avoided. Children younger than two years have thinner layers of skin and insulating subcutaneous tissue than older children and adults. As a result, they lose more heat and water than adults, losing these more rapidly than adults. In young children, temperature regulation is partially based on non-shivering thermogenesis, increasing metabolic rate, oxygen consumption, and lactate production. In addition, because of disproportionately thin skin, a burn that may initially appear to be of partial thickness in a child may instead be full thickness in depth. Thus, the child’s thin skin may make initial burn depth assessment difficult. For these reasons, children with major burn trauma should be best treated in a pediatric burn center [6].

In infants, voluntary grasping begins at four months, and head and trunk control is completed in about nine months. Infants crawl at 9–11 months and start walking unaided at one year of age [7]. Burn epidemiology is a valuable tool for targeting interventions to reduce the incidence of such injuries and identifying high-risk populations [8, 9]. For this purpose, its epidemiology needs to be better understood to prevent burns in the infant population.

Methods

This is a retrospective study conducted on the burn of infants aged 12 months or less who were admitted to the Diyarbakır Gazi Yaşargil Training and Research Hospital Burn Center between January 2016 and September 2021 were included. We evaluated 206 infants with burn injuries. This study is retrospective, and written informed consent was obtained from all participants and their caregivers for the dataset used and analyzed during this study. The study was conducted under the principles of the 2008 Declaration of Helsinki, and the electronic medical record system was reviewed retrospectively with the permission of the hospital's chief physician. Patients' Demographic data, injury-related data (burn status, cause of burn injury, TBSA (total body surface area), and burn degree), major complications, and treatment outcomes were reported from the electronic medical record system.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics for the continuous variables were presented as Mean and Standard deviation, while count and percentages for categorical variables. Chi-square test was performed to determine the relationship between categorical variables. Statistical significance level was considered as 5% and SPSS (Chi. Ill. USA) statistical program was used for all statistical computations.

Results

Between January 2016 and October 2021, 206 patients aged one year and younger were seen in our burn center. Of the patients, 120 (58.3%) were male, and 86 (41.7%) were female. The mean age was 10.0 ± 2.0 months (Table 1).

Table 1 General information about patients

The total cases ranged from 3 to 12 months, with the highest number of patients seen in 12th-month infants (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

0–1 age group motor scale and percentage of patients

The low age of the mothers, the high number of births, and the low financial situation increased the risk of burn injury.

When we look at the etiology of burns, scalding burns were the most common, with 184 (89.3%) cases. The most common causes of scalding burns were 80.6% (n:166) hot water, 4.8% (n:10) hot oily water food, and 3.9% hot milk burns. Scalding burns were nine times more common in the 0–1 age group than other burn etiologies (p < 0.001).

The most common cause of hot object burns was hot stove contact burns in nine (4.4%) cases. It was formed by touching the stove by the children left next to the hot stove to warm up in cold seasons. Other reasons were a hot teapot, hot teacup, hot plate, and hot hair straightener.

In our study, 54.4% (n: 112) of the burn traumas occurred in the city, and 45.6% (n: 94) occurred in the rural area. Most of the burns occurred in the kitchen because their mothers and children spent much time there.

Burn trauma started in January and peaked in March. It decreased in summer. However, the TBSA of patients reached the highest number in July and August (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Distribution of burn cases by months

The wound culture results obtained with punch biopsy were positive in 23.8%. The most common microorganism in wound culture results was Staphylococcus aureus, with 5.8% (Table 2).

Table 2 Wound culture results

In the majority of cases, more than one region was affected. The most affected areas were the left upper extremity (43.2%). 45.6% of the burned areas were 2nd degree and 54.4% (n:112) 3rd degree. The overall mean estimated total burn surface area (TBSA) was 8.19 ± 5.04 (min:1-max:25). Most of the cases underwent escharectomy in the operating room and were treated with dressings. Skin grafting was performed on only 10.7% (n:22) of the patients.

The mean hospital stay of the patients was 4.99 ± 3.67 days. Our mortality rate due to sepsis was 1.94% (n:4).

Dıscussıon

Primitive reflexes in infants gradually decrease from the first month to the third month; however, motor reflexes increase gradually starting from the first month [10]. Studies examining injuries for infants under one year old noted an increased injury rate in the second six months of life. The peak of burn applications, especially in boys in the seventh and ninth months, can be explained by the achievement of important milestones of locomotor development at this age [11, 12]. Our study is consistent with the literature, and our burn cases have increased gradually since the first three months and peaked at the 12th month in parallel with motor development.

Increased burn injury predilection in infant boys is unclear, and differences in exposure to risk did not wholly explain the sex differences [11]. In our study, it was seen that more burn trauma was in the male population, with a ratio of 1.4.

Alsalman et al. [12] stated in their study that the upper extremities were the most frequently affected body parts. In our study, The areas most affected by burns are the left upper extremity, right and left lower extremities, right upper extremity, trunk, abdomen, head, and perineum, respectively. We attribute this to the Infant's specific group, which begins to develop mobility, starting from rolling, crawling, and finally walking around the age of one year.

The most common cause of pediatric burns is scalding burns, accounting for 88.8% of all cases. It has been reported that scalding burns are a common cause of home burns. Gender, parity, socioeconomic status, and especially the mother's age influence infant burn injury risk [1, 11, 13, 14]. Our study found that the most common cause of burns was scalding at a rate of 89.3%, consistent with the literature.

In the study of H. Karimi et al., The positive culture rate from the wound site was 42.9%. In our study, however, this rate was 23.8%,and Staphylococcus spp. was isolated most frequently in culture. In this respect, our result is consistent with the H. Karimi et al. [15] study. In the study of H. Karimi et al., Before arriving at the hospital, 22 patients had received traditional therapy at home, which was not effective and caused some problems. In our study, patients received first aid treatment by directly applying to the hospital emergency department.

As a culture, the food of our region is served hot, and usually, after the sixth month of one-year-old children, food is given sitting on the floor. This creates risky areas where infants can easily reach and where accidents can happen quickly. In this study, pediatric burns most frequently occurred while cooking or eating in the kitchen. The incidence of pediatric burns increased gradually from January and peaked in March. In our region, Children are often given hot meals, which pose a risk, except for the cold foods served during the hottest months (June, July, and August).

According to the study of Dai et al., most contact burns were caused by a hot object falling on the child or by children falling on a hot object [11]. In our study, most contact burns were caused by the negligence of mothers who left their children near the stove to warm them during the cold winter months. It developed due to contact with a hot stove in children who developed a catching reflex.

Children of young mothers with low socioeconomic status are at greater risk. Similarly, Shah et al. [16] stated that having many children in a family and increasing financial deprivation increases the risk of scalding injuries. Therefore, young mothers can receive a short education and training to reduce the risk. Children of young mothers generally have a high risk of morbidity and mortality. Therefore, special attention should be paid to preventing burns, giving the mothering advice on how to care for the baby, and supporting young mothers' maternity and living conditions.

Conclusıon

In conclusion, since the etiology of infant burns is different from other age groups, infant burns should be reported and investigated accurately. As preventive measures, it is necessary to increase protective measures at home and to raise awareness of families about burn etiologies. Future studies should include other important variables contributing to burns in infants, such as socioeconomics and parental education level.

Availability of data and materials

The dataset used and/or analyzed during this study is available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Özlü Ö, Başaran A (2022) Epidemiology and outcome of 1442 pediatric burn patients: A single-center experience. Turkish J Traum Emerg Surg 28(1):57–61

    Google Scholar 

  2. Yasa MK, KaracaSivrikaya S (2021) Yoğun Bakımda Yanıklı Hastalarda Enfeksiyon Kontrolü ve Bakım Yönetimi. Arşiv Kaynak Tarama Dergisi 30(2):68–75. Retrieved from: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/aktd/issue/62990/767536

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sesti J, Paul S (2020) Commentary: Burn, baby, burn. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 160(5):1348–1349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.08.087. (Epub 2019 Sep 20 PMID: 31610961)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ardahan E, Yıldırım Sarı H (2016) Pediatrik yanık vakalarında besin desteği. Çocuk Cerrahisi Dergisi. 30(2):106–113

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gülhan B et al (2020) Infections in pediatric burn patients: an analysis of one hundred eighty-one patients. Surg Infect. 21(4):357–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sharma RK, Parashar A (2010) Special considerations in paediatric burn patients. Indian J Plast Surg 43(Suppl):S43–50. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-0358.70719. (PMID:21321657;PMCID:PMC3038395)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Thomason ME, Hect J, Waller R, Manning JH, Stacks AM, Beeghly M et al (2018) Prenatal neural origins of infant motor development: Associations between fetal brain and infant motor development. Dev Psychopathol 30(3):763–772. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095457941800072X. (PMID:30068433;PMCID:PMC6261435)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Ravat F, Fontaine M, Latarjet J, Voulliaume D (2018) Brûlures : épidémiologie, évaluation, offre de soins [Burn: epidemiology, evaluation, organisation of care]. Rev Prat. 68(10):1078–1082 (French. PMID: 30869211)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Grant EJ (2017) Burn Injuries: Prevention, Advocacy, and Legislation. Clin Plast Surg 44(3):451–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cps.2017.02.005. (PMID: 28576234)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kim HH, Kim JY, Jang BK, Lee JH, Kim JH, Lee DH et al (2022) Multiview child motor development dataset for AI-driven assessment of child development. Gigascience. 12:giad039. https://doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giad039. (PMID: 37243520; PMCID: PMC10220505)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Purcell LN, Banda W, Akinkuotu A, Phillips M, Hayes-Jordan A, Charles A (2022) Characteristics and predictors of mortality in-hospital mortality following burn injury in infants in a resource-limited setting. Burns. 48(3):602–607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2021.07.004. (Epub 2021 Jul 13. PMID: 34284937; PMCID: PMC8755851)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Alsalman AK et al (2015) Epidemiology of infant burn in Eastern Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J. 36(3):324

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Jordan KC, Di Gennaro JL, von Saint André-von Arnim A, Stewart BT (2022) Global trends in pediatric burn injuries and care capacity from the World Health Organization Global Burn Registry. Front Pediatr. 10:954995. https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2022.954995. (PMID: 35928690; PMCID: PMC9343701)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Ruan J, Xi M, Xie W (2021) Analysis of 12,661 pediatric burns in Wuhan institute of burns: A retrospective study of fifteen years. Burns 47(8):1915–1921. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2021.02.021. (Epub 2021 Feb 27 PMID: 33736899)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Karimi H et al (2012) Epidemiology of paediatric burns in Iran. Ann Burns Fire Disasters 25(3):115

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Shah M et al (2013) Risk factors for scald injury in children under 5 years of age: a case–control study using routinely collected data. Burns 39(7):1474–1478

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

This study was solely funded by the corresponding author.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

EY and IT conceptualized and drafted the initial manuscript and reviewed and revised the manuscript. YDY revised and finalized the editing of the manuscript. EY and IT critically reviewed the manuscript for important intellectual content. All authors approved the final manuscript as submitted and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ebral Yiğit.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Retrospective /none.

Consent for publication

Informed assent and written informed consent was obtained from all participants and their care givers.

Competing interests

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Demir Yiğit, Y., Yiğit, E. & Taş, I. Burn trauma in infants. Egypt Pediatric Association Gaz 71, 39 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43054-023-00189-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43054-023-00189-4

Keywords